Dealing with an Imperial Colossus

I think Donald Trump is going to be re-elected in November. It was a conclusion I reached as I sat on my couch last Monday night, fruitlessly waiting for returns from the Iowa Democratic Caucuses. As I write this more than a week later, we still don't know what the final tally was. The stakes were enormous, and Iowa Democrats managed to screw it up, handing Trump, and all those who suck up to him, a series of talking points to challenge the validity of the entire electoral process-- anyone remember "system is rigged against us"? Expect to hear that a lot this fall.

Iowa was an epic, inexcusable debacle.

The Incumbency Economy

As many others have noted, Iowa was not the only political victory for Donald Trump. The U.S. economy added 225,000 jobs in January. The country's unemployment rate is at a ridiculously low 3.6%. Moreover, Trump's abject ignorance around policy-making, including ill-advised unilateralism on trade, are not having the catastrophic impact on economic growth many predicted. Trump understandably took at victory lap on the economy in his State of the Union Address on Tuesday night.

Dispute Settlement and the USMCA

Some of you are undoubtedly basking in warm fuzzy feelings from holiday time spent with friends and family. Others of you are probably just glad to be home, happy to have survived a week or two with family, perhaps wishing you'd had better dispute resolution tools at your disposal.

via GIPHY

USMCA: Curb Your Enthusiasm

The drumbeat of bizarre political juxtapositions just keeps rolling over us. Yesterday was no exception. First, the House Democrats released its two Article of Impeachment against President Trump focused on "abuse of power" and "obstruction of Congress." An hour later, many of those same Democrats were before the podium announcing they had worked out a deal with the White House to move forward on one of President Trump's signature trade initiatives, the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA, or to some, NAFTA2.0).

I suppose the fact that many of us remain flabbergasted (alarmed?) by the daily barrage of these juxtapositions could be read as a source of comfort, cold comfort? Although the impeachment saga routinely sucks most of the oxygen out of the headlines, the USMCA briefly held center-stage. I was struck the generally positive headlines about the bargain struck between House Democrats and the White House were. A rare instance of cooperation between Trump and House Democrats? A sign of some sort of return to a bipartisan consensus on the merits of trade? A template for 21st Century trade agreements?

Hardly. The best I can muster about the USMCA is that it could have been worse.

Authoritarianism

Madison, Hamilton, and Good Sleep

Another semester of teaching around here is winding down and yesterday afternoon was the last seminar. My department happens to have a number of senior seminars that are "variable topics" courses; the precise content may differ semester to semester depending on the instructor.  The course was Political Science 484, Topics in U.S. Politics and Policy. I've taught this particular section in the past, but decided last winter that I would try something different.

Ackowledgement I Wish I'd Written

It's been nearly a year since I made any sort of contribution to this space. The main culprit was a book project on the re-negotiated NAFTA. About this time last year, the negotiations came to a rapid conclusion. I had to step on the gas. I'm rather pleased with the outcome. I'm happy to have some of my musings about he NAFTA in a single location. It should be on the shelf sometime later in October. I quite like the cover.

A Trump-Inspired Holiday Reading List... Humbug!!!!

There's no other way to put it, 2018 sucked. I still put a lot of faith in what James Madison wrote in the Federalist Papers about "ambition being made to counteract ambition" as an antidote to the "mischiefs of faction." Even if Trump's election in 2016 signalled the status quo was no longer acceptable (a judgement of voters I understood), I slept well at night knowing the the famous "checks and balances" and the "separation of powers" would limit any of the worst impulses of an inexperienced, incompetent narcissist such as we have.

Some Election Day Non-predictions

Today is U.S. midterm election day. I've been doing a lot more thinking about U.S. politics of late than writing about it, in part because it's become such a depressing, rapidly changing dumpster fire. Rather than a bunch of predictions about the outcome, or an effort at scenario forecasting, I simply wanted to get a few things on paper that I'll be focusing on starting Wednesday November 7

Time to Vote

1) The States, in particular, who controls governors' mansions and the state legislatures. If the Democrats can show some signs of life in places they've neglected while the GOP has placed a strangle-hold, the makings of significant change could be on the horizon.

2) The 2020 Presidential Campaign begins Wednesday morning. The Democratic bench still seems worryingly thin, although there will likely be no shortage of entrants. Who, if anyone, will challenge Trump in the GOP primaries?
2a) Primary season may kick off with the first debates among candidates as early as the spring of 2019 (good grief).

NAFTA2.0,... Ahem, USMCA?

So, we have a deal. But what's in it? Is the North American sky about to fall as I argued in my last post? Has the North American Idea been thrown overboard by Donald Trump, once and for all? Is the new NAFTA2.0 a retrograde descent into economic nationalism?

Name will take getting used to

Here are a few quick (possibly inaccurate) thoughts on some of the provisions of what's officially being called the United States Mexico Canada Agreement.

What's in a Name?

The first thing to change is the name of the Agreement. Trump thinks the NAFTA label came with too many negative associations. Indeed, NAFTA1.0 has been a political football from the start. The irony of Trump's complaints about the NAFTA name is that he contributed mightily in a very short time to creating those negative associations; worst agreement ever negotiated, our negotiators were really stupid, the world is ripping us off...

I don't think USMCA is going to stick, except among public officials who are compelled to use the name. Moreover, I am a little worried that if things go sideways at any point, this particular acronym will be framed as "United States Made Canada do it."

Requiem for the North American Idea

There are many things about the Trump Presidency that keep me awake at night. After Trump was elected, I was among those who turned to James Madison and the Federalist Nos. 10 and 51 for solace. I was certain the same institutional design that intentionally put so many barriers in the way of "getting things done" would constrain Trump's worst (but then not fully appreciated) excesses. My alarm at the damage being done grows by the day. In fact, as great as Madison's design is, I'm not sure it was designed to constrain this kind of aberrational president, nor the sustained assault on the core institutions of American democracy.

I openly wonder who is going to put the toothpaste back in the tube? Can it be put back? Trump didn't create this mess so much as he's a manifestation of a host of problems that have been simmering for a long time. Indeed, one of the most insightful comments I read during all of the memorials around Sen. John McCain's death is that in selecting Sarah Palin as his running mate in 2008, he played a significant role in laying the foundation of today's populist assault on the truth in the GOP

Rock Paper Scissors for Trade

To Trade or Not to Trade?

Of course, one of my interests is the global trading system and my alarm at the damage being done here is also acute. The amount of damage Trump has done to America's leadership credibility in global trade is going to take a very long time to repair. It's unclear to me that it can be repaired since, in my view, Trump has arrived at the most inopportune moment for resolving important problems within. Smarter, more thoughtful voices were already calling for significant changes to how the global trading system's rules were written. Of note here, the basis for the long-stalled Doha Round of the WTO launched in late 2001 was development; hence the name Doha Development Round. Indeed, issues important to the developing world were to be the center-piece of the Round, starting with agriculture. We know what has happened there.

Much as I turned to Madison to ease my concerns about the erosion of American political institutions during Trump's reign, I similarly sought solace in the rules of the global trading regime. "We'll be able to ride this out," I thought. Moreover, "we've seen this movie before." Indeed, xenophobia in the hands of anti-trade populists has been the weapon of choice for centuries. Yet, I reasoned that rules largely designed and underwritten by U.S. leadership would, even in the face of nonsense from Trump, not quickly be tossed aside.  It was in America's interests to stick to the rules. Not only had the United States been a financial beneficiary of open, rules-based trade, the political prestige and leadership benefits of being the "indispensable" country for that system would surely appeal to Trump's better senses (or at least his ego).

Nope.

The Trade and Tariff Trumpster Fire

I've been searching high and low for sources of solace about the state of global affairs with Trump in the White House. They are depressingly hard to come by. I've found a sliver of solace in, believe it or not,... trade policy.

Progressive Trade Policy, Redux

Last November, the Government of Canada launched what it called a "Progressive Trade Policy" agenda. I wrote a little piece offering a few critiques (linked here). The punchline was that I thought it was devoid of much substance, starting with default proposition that trade liberalization as practiced was not progressive. Trade liberalization is inherently progressive. Always has been.